Archive

Archive for the ‘rape’ Category

Two Iranian dissidents Say They Were Raped in Captivity

October 2, 2009 12 comments
By Ivan Watson and Noushin Seiyed Hoseiny Novin
CNN

Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

Editor’s Note: Be aware that the following story contains graphic accounts of rapes. CNN does not normally identify alleged rape victims but did so in this dispatch with the permission of the alleged victims.

ISTANBUL, Turkey (CNN) — Two Iranians who were caught up in the waves of arrests that followed the disputed presidential elections in June have accused their captors of raping them.

By telling his story, Ibrahim Sharifi says, he "committed social suicide so this incident wouldn't happen to others."

By telling his story, Ibrahim Sharifi says, he “committed social suicide so this incident wouldn’t happen to others.”

Click to view previous image
1 of 2
Click to view next image

//

An Iranian man and a woman made the allegations in separate interviews with CNN. Both said they fled to Turkey from Iran after claiming to have been threatened by Iranian security services. While CNN does not normally use the names of alleged rape victims, their names are included here with their permission.

CNN could not independently confirm their accounts. But the testimony of one of the alleged rape victims, Ibrahim Sharifi, was revealed last month by a prominent Iranian opposition leader who claimed to have gathered at least four accounts of sexual assault this summer in Iranian prisons. Sharifi’s allegations were also included in a report published last week by two Western human rights organizations investigating reports of abuse in Iranian prisons.

“What we’re encountering are numerous accounts of brutality, poor treatment, even torture, serious beatings, and a couple of cases, as you know, of alleged sexual assault — rape,” said Joe Stork, Middle East deputy director for Human Rights Watch.

The Iranian government has launched two investigations into the allegations. Iran’s judiciary concluded there was no evidence of rape. A parliamentary fact-finding committee is still working on the issue.

Repeated calls by CNN to get reaction from Iranian officials to the claims of the alleged victims did not result in a response.

“Take him and get him pregnant”

Twenty-four-year-old Ibrahim Sharifi is a university student from Tehran who campaigned actively on the Internet for opposition presidential candidate Mehdi Karrubi in the run-up to the controversial June 12 vote.

When incumbent president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared winner, Sharifi joined the throngs of angry protesters in the streets who accused the government of rigging the election.

On June 22, Sharifi said, he was kidnapped, handcuffed, blindfolded and stuffed into a car by three unknown men while he was walking home from language lessons at the Italian Embassy. He said they drove him to an unknown location, where he was stripped to his underwear. There, he said, he endured several days of beatings and mock executions alongside other male prisoners, all the time tightly blindfolded. Video Watch Ibrahim Sharifi describe being tortured and sexually assaulted »

“They took us and they put a noose around my neck in a way that I was forced to stand on my tiptoes, unable to breathe,” Sharifi said. “Somebody was constantly telling us … ‘You have received the oral sentence to be hanged, we are just waiting for the written order.’”

“There was the stink of piss and blood. It smelled terrible,” Sharifi recalled. “I was beaten so much I didn’t have any energy left to cry.”

On the fourth day of his detention, during one of these mock executions, Sharifi said he finally snapped.

“I said, if you want to kill us, go ahead. Why do you play such games with us? And the response was a kick in my stomach that made me fall.”

Sharifi said his captors kicked him repeatedly in the stomach until he started vomiting blood. He showed a pink scar on his belly from a previous car accident that he said was torn open by the blows.

“Then the guy told someone else, ‘Take him and get him pregnant,’” Sharifi said, his voice cracking with emotion. “They tied my hands to the wall and tied my legs, and then did that thing to me. While doing it, he was telling me, “You, who cannot even defend your you-know-what, you wanted to conduct a revolution?”

Sharifi said he blacked out during the rape and woke up later, handcuffed to a hospital bed. A day later, he said, his captors dumped him, blindfolded, on the side of a highway.

“I was raped. Raped four times”

Twenty-one-year-old Maryam Sabri spoke to CNN by telephone from a Turkish city where, like Sharifi, she is waiting for the U.N. High Commission for Refugees to process her request for asylum.

She said she was arrested by men in plainclothes on July 30 while attending a ceremony at the grave of Neda Agha-Soltan, the Iranian woman whose death was captured by cell phone camera after she was shot during a protest in the streets of Tehran.

“When I asked them where was I being taken to, why have you arrested me, who are you?” their response was a constant slap on my face,” Sabri recounted.

Sabri said she was interrogated several times after being detained. The sexual assault began during the third interrogation, she said.

“He said, ‘OK, you wanted your vote back? Now I’m going to give back your vote.” It was then that I was raped. Raped four times,” she said.

“My hands were tied and my eyes were blindfolded,” she said. “He threw me on the ground while pressing my throat with one hand, and both my legs were under the weight of his legs so I couldn’t move at all.”

Sabri said the last time she was raped, her assailant took off her blindfold and said he would release her on the condition that, once out of prison, she remain in contact with him and cooperate with him.

Several days after her release, Sabri said the alleged rapist, described as a man in his late 30s with light eyes and several days’ worth of stubble, began calling her on her cell phone and threatening her.

She fled Iran several weeks later and applied for refugee status in Turkey.

Rape as punishment?

Human rights organizations Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran have expressed alarm about the reports of sexual assault in prison.

“The issue is, are the authorities using rape as a tool to pressure people, to punish people?” asked Stork, the Middle East deputy director for Human Rights Watch. “In the case of the one individual, Ibrahim Sharifi, it appears it was a punishment.”

Iran’s parliament and judiciary launched investigations into the allegations. But last month, Iranian security forces raided the offices of Karrubi, the opposition presidential candidate and longtime advocate for prisoners’ rights who first publicized the rape allegations. The offices of another opposition candidate, Mir Hossein Moussavi, were also raided in September.

Iran’s powerful conservative parliamentary speaker, Ali Larijani, said a special committee of Iran’s parliament, or Majlis, conducted a “precise and comprehensive inquiry” into the treatment at Tehran’s Evin and Kahrizak prisons and found “no cases of rape or sexual abuse,” government-funded Press TV reported last month.

Larijani accused Karrubi of spreading “sheer lies.”

However, not everyone was persuaded by the investigation. “The Iranian authorities appear more intent on finding the identities of those who claim to have been tortured by security officials than in carrying out an impartial investigation,” said Amnesty International Secretary General Irene Khan.

Sabri and Sharifi are members of a growing population of expatriate Iranian dissidents in Turkey. Both face an uncertain future as refugees here and worry about the safety of their families back in Tehran.

Sabri claims her father was arrested after she first went public with her rape testimony on the U.S. government-funded network Voice of America.

Sharifi, meanwhile, said that before he fled Iran, government investigators accused him of lying about his prison experience for money … charges he angrily denies.

advertisement

“I broke a taboo in Iran,” he said, weeping. “I sat in front of the camera and committed social suicide so this incident wouldn’t happen to others.”

“I want the whole world to know that Iran’s problems are not only limited to the nuclear issue,” he said. “The Iranian regime plays games with other countries of the world. It plays the same games with its own nation and people.”

Categories: rape Tags:

There’s nothing romantic about rape

April 26, 2009 2 comments

Inquirer Headlines / Nation

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090425-201362/Theres-nothing-romantic-about-rape

‘There’s nothing romantic about rape’

By Michael Lim Ubac
Philippine Daily Inquirer

Posted date: April 25, 2009

MANILA, Philippines – Senators yesterday lamented the reversal of Lance Corporal Daniel Smith’s rape conviction but agreed that he was free to go.“A free man has the choice to leave the country with his head held high or … skulking like a thief in the night,” said Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr.

Pimentel, a lawyer, said an acquittal in the country was “immediately executory.”

“Holding [Smith] in detention further would be an unnecessary derogation of his liberty,” said the senator.

Senator Francis Escudero, also a lawyer, said the Philippine government could not run to the Supreme Court to file an appeal because “only under very exceptional cases is appeal available in an acquittal given the double jeopardy rule.”

But he assailed the haste with which Smith was spirited out.

“[The US government] did not even waste a day … It’s really saddening that justice even here in our country favors foreigners. We are oppressed abroad and we’re still losers here in our own country,” Escudero said.

Pimentel said Smith’s acquittal was to be expected given the affidavit that “Nicole,” his purported victim, submitted last month expressing doubt that she had been raped.

“In effect, she said there was no rape. And the Court of Appeals is both a trier of facts and law. And so, they must have considered that withdrawal as a vital link between innocence and the eventual acquittal of Smith,” Pimentel said.

He added: “Of course … there may have been pressure. But as for how the court came up with its ruling, I am sure it tended to focus on the retraction.”

‘Romantic’?

Women senators assailed the Court of Appeals (CA) for saying that what had occurred between Nicole and Smith in November 2005 was “a spontaneous romantic episode.”

Senator Pia Cayetano, chairperson of the Senate committee on welfare, said in a text message: “When has rape become romantic? This decision could set a dangerous precedent for other rape cases that consent is given if one is ‘carried away’ by passion and one has had ‘a drink too many.’”

Senator Loren Legarda, co-author of a law penalizing all forms of violence against women, said:

“First off, the court chose not to believe Nicole’s statement that she never consented to having sex with Smith and that she, despite being intoxicated, resisted. Instead, the CA painted its own version of the incident about an allegedly scorned and vengeful woman.

“The court likewise imposed its own interpretation of what was on the mind of Nicole and her physical condition at the time of what the CA claimed to be a mere romantic episode.”

Legarda said the CA’s reversal of the rape conviction was “controversial, even without considering perceptions, rightly or wrongly, that the US may have had a hand on how events had played out.”

“What’s so romantic about a woman regaining consciousness to find a man forcing himself on her? It is immaterial if a drinking binge caused the woman to pass out – that is not an excuse for anyone to take advantage of her,” the senator said.

“This decision is a setback to the promotion and protection of the rights of women against all forms of violence and exploitation,” she said.

Betrayal

Some 300 activists marched on the US Embassy from the Court of Appeals to express outrage at Smith’s acquittal and said the court’s ruling was a strong argument for the scrapping of the RP-US Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA).

The agreement governs the conduct of US troops engaged in military exercises in the country.

Members of partylist groups Gabriela and Anakpawis, the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, and Task Force Subic said the appellate court justices had “betrayed the Filipinos.”

“By acquitting Smith, they have trampled on the hard-fought justice of women on the Subic rape case and the fight of all Filipinos to defend our dignity as a people,” Gabriela spokesperson Joms Salvador said in a statement.

The activists said Smith’s acquittal meant that “through the VFA, US soldiers could get away with ravaging our people.”

“The US government’s adamant refusal to turn over Smith to Philippine authorities underscores the grossly unequal relations between the United States and the Philippines under the VFA,” Salvador said.

The activists were blocked by some 20 female members of the Manila Police District civil disturbance management backed by some 20 policemen.

Thus, they were unable to even set foot on Roxas Boulevard and were confined to a side street near the Bay View Hotel.

They voluntarily dispersed after airing their protest.

Abrogation

Echoing the activists, Senator Francis Pangilinan said the reversal of Smith’s rape conviction gave credence to calls for the abrogation of the VFA.

Pangilinan said that while Nicole’s case was separate from the move to abrogate the agreement, the CA decision had actually bolstered the arguments against it.

“While I believe that the acquittal of Smith has no bearing on the illegality of the VFA, it still must be abrogated. If for nothing else, we must ensure that we do not have a repeat of this sorry incident. The VFA must be terminated to uphold the dignity of our women and our sovereignty as a nation,” he said.

Pangilinan has authored a resolution seeking to compel President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to abrogate the agreement because of its lopsided nature, and to seek a new one.

In Senate Resolution No. 892 filed in February, Pangilinan called for the termination of the VFA on grounds that its provisions were unconstitutional.

Special treatment of US soldiers

Yesterday, the senator said “there was no other proof necessary to show that the VFA provides special and preferential treatment to US soldiers facing criminal cases in our justice system.”

“The manner in which Smith’s case has progressed, including the swiftness of his release, tells us that some are more equal than others in our criminal justice system, especially when you happen to be a US soldier under the custody of the US Embassy,” Pangilinan said.

Pimentel said the Philippines could not abrogate the VFA unilaterally.

“It is a treaty that has to take into account the views of the partner, which, in this case, happens to be a giant. We pygmies in this international game are tied up with a giant. What I am saying is if [abrogation] is the aim of some of my colleagues, that will be quite difficult to do,” he said.

‘It worked’

Love it or hate it, the Philippine justice system worked in Smith’s case, according to Parañaque Representative Roilo Golez.

“The Philippine justice system worked, but whether it worked well depends on the parties concerned. The process functioned, as evidenced by the filing of the case and conviction at the [trial court] level,” Golez said in a text message.

The lawmaker said that while Smith’s loss in the CA and eventually the Supreme Court would have been the popular outcome for Filipinos, Nicole’s affidavit proved fatal to the case.

“Change the personalities and inject the retraction of the victim, and in all likelihood the accused would still be acquitted on appeal. That’s how the Philippine judicial system works. If Nicole had fought the way [actress] Maggie dela Riva did [in the 1970s], there would have been no way that Smith would be acquitted,” Golez said.

Political pressure

But Bayan Muna Representative Satur Ocampo said Smith’s acquittal was a major blow not only to Philippine sovereignty and dignity but also jurisprudence.

“[It] raises questions on probable political pressure on the justices coming from the US government and the executive branch,” he said in a statement.

Ocampo lamented that the CA adopted the defense’s side by giving more credence to Nicole’s affidavit, which, he said, was prepared by Smith’s lawyers.

“In practical effect, the CA decision abets the abuses of ‘visiting’ US military forces that have a historical record since the long years of the US military presence in the country,” he said.

In a text message, Ocampo said the rape case could have ended differently for the honor and dignity of the Philippine government “had not the GMA [Gloria Macapaf\gal-Arroyo] government been so obeisant to the US” and insisted on holding Smith in a Philippine jail.

Categories: rape Tags:
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.